Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sure, if you want to remove it from operators, that is fine, but adding > it to identifiers seems weird seeing as only one person wants it and it > isn't standard. ?? I don't see any value in not using $ for *either* purpose. That breaks backwards compatibility for hardly any gain at all. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifie... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in iden... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in ... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Dann Corbit
- Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers Dann Corbit