>>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > If you have a concrete suggestion (= patch) for the documentation, I'm > all ears. I'm still working on section "Serializable Isolation versus True Serializability", but here are all the changes I can see which precede it. Has the review of the SQL specs convinced everyone that this much is appropriate? It also seems like the "Data Consistency Checks at the Application Level" section could use a little more detail. Since referential integrity checks are so well understood, and don't work reliably under snapshot serialization without explicit locks, perhaps that could be added? -Kevin
serializable-doc1.diff
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers