James Mansion wrote:
>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>c. Are there any well-known pitfalls/objections which would prevent me
>>>from
>>> changing the algorithm to something more efficient (read: IO-bound)?
>>copyright licenses and patents
>Would it be possible to have a plugin facility?
>I guess the most likely candidate is the LZJB mechanism in ZFS which is
>CDDL licensed.
The most likely candidate for a speedy algorithm seems QuickLZ, the author
is willing to accomodate the licensing.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
