James Mansion wrote: >Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>c. Are there any well-known pitfalls/objections which would prevent me >>>from >>> changing the algorithm to something more efficient (read: IO-bound)?
>>copyright licenses and patents >Would it be possible to have a plugin facility? >I guess the most likely candidate is the LZJB mechanism in ZFS which is >CDDL licensed. The most likely candidate for a speedy algorithm seems QuickLZ, the author is willing to accomodate the licensing. -- Sincerely, Stephen R. van den Berg. Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers