Greg Stark wrote: > > On 7 Jan 2009, at 09:47, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> It's required by the sync replication patch, but has no value > >> otherwise. > > > > Well, we have talked about allowing more signalling long-term, and > > this > > would accomplish that independent of the sync replication, so we might > > want to revisit this someday if it isn't included in sync replication. > > I also needed this for the progress indicator patch. I used SIGQUIT > for the proof-of-concept patch but I wouldn't want to lose that signal > for real.
Yep, we want multiplexed signals independent of sync replication. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
