D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> So what have we decided about this suggestion. Should I submit the
> patch or just forget about it? So far some people like it and some
> people think that it is unneccessary. No one so far has suggested that
> it would harm the system or people's use of it.
I have gone over the discussion about this issue. I think there is
interest in a ReST output format, but only a 100% ReST-compliant one. I
don't think anyone felt they wanted a ReST-like format just for
appearance sake. For that reason, I have added this TODO entry:
Support the ReST table output format
Details about the ReST format:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html
*
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01007.php
As I remember, no actual patch was posted for this.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
