D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:08:06 -0500 (EST)
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Right, so Tom says it isn't 100% ReST:
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01310.php
>
> Right but did you see the followup?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01319.php
Yes, I did, and now I see why you said there might be only a few broken
cases. But I did not see any documentation in the standard saying that
was OK:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#escaping
so it might be that your ReST interpreter is broken.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
