"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > Greg Smith <gsm...@gregsmith.com> wrote: >> I thought at one point that the direction this was going toward was to >> provide the size of the WAL file as a parameter you can use in the >> archive_command: > Hard to beat for performance. I thought there was some technical > snag. Yeah: the archiver process doesn't have that information available.
regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers