> 2009/1/10 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >>> Uh, is this ready to be applied? >> >> I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior. > > I thing, so this is bug - RETURN QUERY has to supply FOR SELECT LOOP > RETURN NEXT pattern. > > My first patch expected so RETURN QUERY is final statement, so I don't > solve FOUND variable, but Heikki changed this behave. > > Without correct FOUND behave we can't to use RETURN QUERY for following > pattern > > RETURN QUERY some; > IF FOUND THEN RETURN; END IF; > RETURN QUERY some_other; > RETURN;
+1. I can't imagine it's good for this to be randomly inconsistent. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers