"Robert Haas" <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> This is a red herring, unless your proposal also includes making the >> master CVS^H^H^Hgit repository world-writable. The complaint I have >> about people posting URLs is that there's no stable archive of what the >> patches really were, and just because it came out of someone's local git >> repository doesn't help that.
> No, git really does help with this. If Simon were making his changes > in git and pushing them to a git branch on git.postgresql.org, you > would be able to see exactly what he changed and when he changed it. Well, if that's actually an archival repository then it would work. But wasn't I just reading something about having to wipe that repository and re-import the CVS history to fix various problems? (In any case, the URLs I'm complaining of weren't pointing at git.postgresql.org, but various private servers or wiki pages.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers