> If it came down to this, then I'd say rip it out. Naming log files by epoch > isn't exactly a user-friendly practice anyway, and there are equivalent but > more readable formatting options available.
There are other alternatives but they're all ugly. For example, we could make %0 (or some sequence that isn't taken) evaluate to the empty string, or we could add another GUC to control the interpretation of this GUC. But I don't think the ugliness is justified in this instance. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
