On Monday 26 January 2009 6:31:48 pm Ron Mayer wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: [...snip...] > > The second problem is that we're not sure it's really the right thing, > > because we have no one who is competent to review the design from a > > security standpoint. But unless we get past the first problem the > > second one is moot. > > Are we underestimating Kaigai Kohei? I seem to see him credited on > the NSA's SELinux pages: > http://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/contrib.shtml > > and it seems his patches there related to postgresql were pretty widely > discussed on the SELinux lists: > http://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/list-archive/0805/index.shtml#26163
I'm pretty sure that when he says "review" that it is implied to be a "peer review" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
