Amit Gupta <amit.pc.gu...@gmail.com> writes: > Upon taking a cursory look at the cost functions of other operators, I > realized that available memory (effective_cache_size) is not > considered for estimating the costs of hash/sort/NLjoin/etc. Why is > that the case?
The relevant number for those is work_mem not effective_cache_size. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers