>>> Gregory Stark <st...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hopefully it's not patent encumbered? Might be better not to check > actually. I've been in correspondence with the authors. That is the first question I asked them. The response (from Michael Cahill): - There are no patent applications covering our work, as far as we are - aware. That is, no patent applications have been lodged for our - work, and no applications are planned. To the best of our - knowledge, our work in this area was novel, so we are not aware of - any prior patents that cover our work. But seriously, I don't want this to lead to a discussion which pulls people from getting 8.4 out the door. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
