Robert, * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > pg_security (which I really think out to be renamed to > pg_selinux_context or something, and make a new table if we someday > support Trusted Solaris or whatever).
Err, this doesn't really make sense if we're doing row-level security,
that's not something which is tied to SELinux or Trusted Solaris. Of
course, it's likely we'll need such a pg_selinux_context table or
something too.. Or maybe pg_security can be pg_rls instead. Just
wanted to avoid confusion over this point.. Assuming Peter's approach
is the path that is generally agreed upon by core..
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
