Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 18:54 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I don't see them as conflicting; I see yours as a missing feature, > > namely the ability to add tables to an autovacuum "group", which could > > have settings attached. Being able to do that is the whole point of > > moving settings to reloptions. > > So your changes will allow these? > > ALTER DATABASE foo SET (autovacuum_enabled = false); > ALTER SCHEMA foo SET (autovacuum_enabled = false); Hmm. Perhaps being able to turn autovacuum on/off per-database is desirable and possible, but I can't see doing it per schema. > CREATE TABLE GROUP foo_group; > ALTER TABLE foo SET TABLE GROUP foo_group; > ALTER TABLE foo2 SET TABLE GROUP foo_group; > ALTER TABLE GROUP SET (autovacuum_enabled = false); Yes, something like that. > Hopefully the grouping of tables is not purely related to AV? Hmm, good question. I was envisioning it only for autovacuum, but it hasn't been vetted on pgsql-hackers. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
