On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PQinitSSL is *broken*. It's always been broken. Since it already > takes a parameter, I say add a special switch...the backwards > compatibility danger doesn't seem too bad. Add a switch to what? I get very nervous for our Windows users when people start talking about changing the libpq API (for those that don't know, Windows doesn't have DLL versioning like Unix - so any non-backwards compatible API change really needs a corresponding filename change to avoid pain and suffering). -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
