Simon Riggs wrote:
I think my proposal still holds water, but I also think it is probably
time to say OK, let's make this simpler and take the subxid tuning off
line.
Agreed.
We would need to increase the max size of the xip array by
2*max_connections. So an increase of 80kB on normal running, which I can
accept.
You only need the bigger xip array while in hot standby mode. Backends
starting after the recovery is done can use just max_connections. And
you were already allocating a bigger subxip array, so the net effect is nil.
Is that the only change you are suggesting to resolve this? I hope so.
Yes.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
