Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm a little bothered by this issue with respect to INSERT, UPDATE, > and DELETE, since it's possible that I have permission to see rows but > not updated them, and it would be a little weird if select and update > with equivalent where clauses operated on different sets of records > (although that can happen anyway, because of BEFORE triggers, and it's > pretty irritating). It's not clear that there's a clean solution > here, but it's at least food for thought.
80% of the problem here is exactly that the proposed solution doesn't seem very semantically clean. And once we accept it we're going to be stuck with it for a long time --- compare for instance the multiple serious annoyances with RULEs, which we can't fix easily because of backwards compatibility considerations. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers