Zdenek Kotala wrote: > > Bruce Momjian p??e v ?t 19. 02. 2009 v 08:08 -0500: > > > you should use vacuum_freeze_min_age instead. On other side it > > breaks > > > vacuumdb backward compatibility which we did not declare, but it > > could > > > be fine. > > > > How does adding a flag break backward compatibiity? > > > > I meant that vacuum_freeze_min_age was introduced in 8.2 and cannot be > used for older database. if you use it you cannot run vacuumdb freeze on > 8.1 and older. See Peter's list of backward compatible applications.
Oh, I can only upgrade 8.3+ so that would not be a problem. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
