On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> [ back to planner stuff after a hiatus ]
>
>> Well, as I wrote upthread:
>
> What you're actually suggesting is modifying the executor to incorporate
> the unique-fication logic into hashjoin and/or mergejoin.  Maybe, but
> that code is way too complex already for my taste (especially mergejoin)
> and what we'd save is, hmm, four lines in the planner.

What you'd save is planning time.

...Robert

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to