On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In theory, I think you could make postgres work on any type of > underlying storage you like by writing a second smgr implementation > that would exist alongside md.c. The fly in the ointment is that > you'd need a more sophisticated implementation of this line of code, > from smgropen: > > reln->smgr_which = 0; /* we only have md.c at present */ I believe there is more than that which would need to be done nowadays. I seem to recall that the storage manager abstraction has slowly been dedicated/optimized for md over the past 6 years or so. It may even be easier/preferred to write a hadoop specific access method depending on what you're looking for from hadoop. -- Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA myYearbook.com
