Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 17:21 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Should we log a warning at startup when effective_cache_size is less
than shared_buffers?
I would say no. Although I could see an argument for the default
effective_cache_size always being the same size as shared_buffers.
That's certainly not what we've meant historically by ECS. Generally
it's been the size of shared_buffers *and* the FS cache. If it were
just the size of shared_buffers, then we wouldn't need a 2nd setting,
would we?
--Josh
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
