On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 22:17 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote: > > Well VLDB is like 2% of what we need. If the above will remove all the > > B.S. currently associated with actually doing PITR (rsync, scp, nfs, > > pg_standby pick your poison) then I am all for it. > > If you use walmgr.py, then all you need is writing a conf file and > making sure that ssh and rsync work. > > Actually the best way to do Sync Rep would have been to just move to C > what walmgr.py does. That the patch could have started off from a > well-tested foundation. >
For sync? > > Log shipping should be: > > > > I am master, my slave is here. > > I am slave, I understand my master is here. > > Here is our mutual authentication love token. > > Let congress begin. > > > > Anything more and we are being difficult for the sake of being > > difficult. > > Actually I'd leave out the first line, and start with just > > - I am slave, my master accepts me, start replicationg > Heh fair enough. > So there could be several slaves, of both hot standby postgresql, > wal-file-store and store-and-forward-to-many types. THat should be optional not the default. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
