Tom Lane wrote: > Selena Deckelmann <[email protected]> writes: >> From the comment in hba.c, it appears that the desired behavior is to >> have the system ignore the failure, > > I'm not sure how you could possibly read that comment that way.
Right. Sorry, poor choice of words. I meant "don't die on reload", essentially. > It might be sane to distinguish initial load from reload, but I think > the behavior is correct as-is for initial load. Agreed. > Also, if we are going to do something like this, we should make sure > it's consistent across all the config files. Ok. I can do that. I'll check with some other people before I send another patch, and I'll go through the rest of the config file loads tomorrow. -selena -- Selena Deckelmann End Point Corporation [email protected] -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
