Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Worst case, we could say that parallel restore isn't supported on >> mingw. I'm not entirely sure why we bother with that platform at all... > > I think you're confusing it with cygwin ...
Yeah. Much as I hate working around the quirks of mingw, I definitely think we need to keep that platform. (yes, cygwin is another story, but let's not repeat that discussion now) //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
