On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:46:28AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 01:27 +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote: > > > Now, of course, counting the upcoming 8.4 there have been three (and a > > bit - the original design predates 8.1, though it did anticipate some > > 8.1 features) new releases against which the original concept can be > > tested. And, guess what, nothing in those releases has even come close > > to invalidating the original design concept (as we knew all along). > > > > If you're still not convinced of that fact, it would be possible to > > take the original design and update it to 8.4 following the original > > plan. But I'm not prepared to spend any time on this if the only > > result is going to be more argument. > > I see the use for some more stable views. > > Would it be better to publish them as an external project?
It's been an external project, newsysviews, since before 8.1 came out. I think it's time to bring it in from the cold. Call the new schema pg_sysviews, plop it in there, and call it done :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
