Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Would it make sense to instead of removing and deferring pieces bit by bit > > to > > instead work the other way around? Extract just the part of the patch that > > maps SELinux capabilities to Postgres privileges as a first patch? Then > > discuss any other parts individually at a later date? > > I think that makes sense. Implement just a very basic core in a first > patch, and start adding checks slowly, one patch each. We have talked > about "incremental patches" in the past. > > We wouldn't get "unbreakable PostgreSQL" in a single commit, but we > would at least start moving. > > The good thing about having started in the opposite direction is that by > now we know that the foundation APIs are good enough to build the > complete feature.
Well, we have been trying to go simplify the SE-PostgreSQL patch since September, and while we have made progress, we still have work to do, and at this point I think we have run out of time. I think we have given it a fair shot, but I don't think it is going to make 8.4. KaiGai-san, the only option I can offer is perhaps to list a URL for your SE-PostgreSQL patch to be applied by people who want to use SE-PG. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers