Simon Riggs wrote: >> Does that answer your question ? > > Not really. I want to understand the actual problem with > idle-in-transaction so we can consider all ways to solve it, rather than > just focus on one method. "idle in transaction timeout" feature may be one of the ways. But I have no specific idea about it now.
-- Tatsuhito Kasahara kasahara.tatsuh...@oss.ntt.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
