Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > Well, as you, I was hoping for a clear solution, and it seems we don't > > > > have one. I think the false-positives problem is real and might make > > > > the greater code coverage of the buildfarm worse than what we did for > > > > 8.3. > > > > > > Huh? What false positive problem? > > > > typedefs listed on platforms that match identifiers in our code that are > > _not_ typedefs. > > Does this actually happen anywhere?
No idea; it was more a theoretical issue to say that having more typedefs is not necessarily a good thing; they should ideally be the typedefs we use, and Windows adds a lot of typedefs we don't use. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
