Marko Kreen <mark...@gmail.com> writes:
> Well, that was also my theory. But my point is that such lockless code
> should be written in more stricter way so it's effects can be clearly
> deduced.
We don't really care that much, for what CountActiveBackends is used for.
> Or at least such roundabout effects should be commented -
> "Ancient pointer here would still point to PGPROC struct".
Agreed, the comment should mention all of these possibilities.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
