Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/4/2 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> So I'm thinking this is really unnecessary and we should leave well
>> enough alone.
> I see it. I thing , an safety of this exception should be solved only
> by programmer. It's important to release all hooks, and then raise an
> exception. It is in developer responsibility.
Well, if the init function is sufficiently carefully coded to back out
just the changes it's managed to apply, then good for it. But we still
aren't losing much by leaving dfmgr as-is.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
