gabriel writes: > So my question is why in the first case the postgre did'nt use the index > and made a seq scan ?? Because it thinks the sequential scan will be faster. You didn't show any evidence to the contrary. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- [HACKERS] INDEX BUG??? gabriel
- Re: [HACKERS] INDEX BUG??? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] INDEX BUG??? Stephan Szabo