Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: > actually, there isn't any difference between a) and b)
> a) select somevariadicwithany(10); > b) select somevariadicwithany(variadic 10); > in this case the keyword VARIADIC is ignored. Well, in my mind what the VARIADIC keyword does is it prevents the parser from building an ARRAY[] expression around the remaining parameters. Which would be incorrect for a VARIADIC ANY function because such a function presumably doesn't want to force all the actual arguments to be the same type --- if it did, it could use VARIADIC ANYARRAY. VARIADIC ANY basically exists to allow an ANY-argument function to accept any number of ANY parameters. As such, PG_NARGS() is all it really needs to know, plus the already-existing support for obtaining the parameters' actual datatypes. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers