Tom Lane escribió: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > This patch seems to be the right cure. (Some other users of > > opt_definition remain; I think it's just CREATE FUNCTION by now). > > Surely this will break other things. I find myself wondering why you > invented ReloptElem at all, instead of adding a field to DefElem.
I had to, precisely because it messes up other uses of DefElem ... For example, the grammar would allow CREATE FUNCTION ... WITH something.name = value which we certainly don't want. I don't expect to break anything else actually. Keep in mind that those "opt_definition" were there precisely to carry reloptions for the affected indexes. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
