On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> If there are no objections, I'm going to remove the following items >> from the list at >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.4_Open_Items >> >> >> change cardinality() for multi-dim arrays? >> >> Drop; there's no consensus that this should be changed > > I don't think we should let this go quite so easily, as this is a new > function, so the bias should be to "getting it right" rather than "don't > change it".
I think it is right already, but the point is debatable. > The supplied functionality is not only surprising, but easily obtained by an > existing function. ISTM if we're supplying a new function it should have new > functionality. Well, it's a compatibility function... ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
