-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
> I think the objection that is most likely to be raised is that it would > confuse or break programs that analyze EXPLAIN output in any degree of > detail. Of course such programs are going to need some work for 8.4 > already. As someone who has written more than one such program, I say go for it, looks like a good solution. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200904052149 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAknZX7IACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjTXgCfdF+qXRLliWjgd4FFFJLzVsh0 zf0AoNN3S02y+4DopOwo/bGTwEXZuA5S =yiKq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
