Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> I think the big issue is that having standard_conforming_strings
> >> affect function behavior introduces the same problems we have had in
> >> the past of having a GUC affect function behavior.
>
> > Can't that be managed with this CREATE FUNCTION option?:
> > SET configuration_parameter { TO value | = value | FROM CURRENT }
>
> It can be, the question is whether we're prepared to break everything
> under the sun until people add that.
I think we would first have to agree to issue escape_string_warning
warnings for code in PL/pgSQL functions, then think about having
standard_conforming_strings control PL/pgSQL behavior; this is what we
did with SQL and it seems to have worked.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
