On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: >> the timestamp column caused the copy to be about 11.3% larger > > Grabbed the wrong numbers. It's really 2.5%, but still....
Well, that's why Tom doesn't want to add it to pg_class. But putting it in a separate table will have no impact on the speed of anything except DDL statements, and even then it won't require copying the whole table, so the performance impact will be pretty minimal, so I think it should be all right. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
