Tom Lane wrote: > I suspect that it's actually impossible to parse such a thing correctly > without a full-fledged flex lexer or something of equivalent complexity. > Certainly it's a couple of orders of magnitude harder than it is for > either standard-conforming or E'' literals.
Is there a reason not to use a full-fledged flex lexer? I'd be willing to take a crack at such a thing, but I'm working 80-hour weeks through the end of June and likely wouldn't be able to put in any time on it till then. So I definitely couldn't promise anything for 8.4, but if putting it off till 8.5 works, sign me up. Cheers, --mlp _____________________ Meredith L. Patterson Founder and CTO Osogato, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
