On Monday 20 April 2009 09:52:05 Pavel Stehule wrote: > I don't believe so is possible to find other general solution. (or > better I didn't find any other solution). Tom has true, > transformationHook on expression is expensive. I thing, so hook on > function should be simple and fast - not all transformation's should > be simple defined via property - classic sample is "decode" like > functions, it needs procedural code.
I find this all a bit premature, given that you haven't clearly defined what sort of user-visible functionality you hope to end up implementing. Which makes it hard to argue why this or that approach might be better. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
