On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Kedar Potdar <kedar.pot...@gmail.com> wrote: > I want to seek general opinion from the community on preferences between > user-friendly ‘Oracle’ syntax, and a more generic syntax that allows ‘gaps’ > in partition ranges?
What happens to records in the overflow table when you add a new partition whose range covers their values? -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
