On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > Warning about very old prepared transactions is something that we > could think about doing as well; it doesn't have to be either-or. > I think the need for it would decrease quite a bit if they weren't > enabled by default, though. > > Comments? Anyone seriously opposed to making the default be zero?
I am not opposed to making the default zero. I am also +1 on adding the warnings. Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
