Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>
wrote:
It strikes me that we really need to try reconnecting to the shared
memory
here several times, and maybe the backoff need to increase each time. On
a
loaded server this cause postgres to fail to restart fairly reliably.
At the risk of sounding predictable, +1. Maybe try 5 times, repeating
at 1, 2, 4 & 8 seconds? Any longer seems like it will be a genuine
failure (so does 8 seconds in fact, but I don't suppose it'll hurt to
try).
1+2+4+8 = 15 seconds
Err, yes. What's your point?
If 8 seconds already seems like it's a genuine failure, then perhaps
retrying at 1, 2 and 4 seconds giving a total delay of 7 seconds is
enough. Maybe you meant that 15 s seems like a genuine failure? Well,
either way, never mind :-)
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
