Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> ...  Maybe we should make that
> setting PGC_POSTMASTER (or just get rid of it?),

Another thought here: if we do get persuaded that the regex_flavor GUC
has to stay, we could eliminate it as a hazard for planning by changing
its scope to PGC_BACKEND.  That would be much less restrictive than
PGC_POSTMASTER; for instance it'd still work to set it for a particular
application via ALTER ROLE.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to