Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I don't think we're going to get this to work reliably without extending > the interface between the backend and restore_command. We've discussed > many methods and there's always some nasty corner-case like that.
> I think we should leave back-branches as is, and go with Simon's > suggestion to add new "recovery_end_command" that's run when the > recovery is finished. That's simpler and more reliable than any of the > other approaches we've discussed, and might become handy for other > purposes as well. > Does someone want to take a stab at writing a patch for that? Does this conclusion mean that changing pg_standby is no longer on the table for 8.4? It certainly smells more like a new feature than a bug fix. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers