Em Sáb, 2009-05-16 às 23:40 -0400, Tom Lane escreveu:
> "Dickson S. Guedes" <lis...@guedesoft.net> writes:
> > Is a simple "SELECT generate_series(now(), CAST('infinity'::date AS
> > timestamp), interval '1 hour');" working forever, an expected
> > behavior?
>
> Uh, what were you expecting it to do?Perhaps, a HINT? > Actually, I believe it will fail eventually when the repeated additions > overflow ... in 294277 AD. So you've got about 2 billion timestamp > additions to wait through. A customer are porting his application to 8.4, and are using a query like that. Someone unintentionally included a "infinity" date and that query have been running until they see the test server memory at 99% and cpu at 100%. I suggested him to use LIMIT. []s -- Dickson S. Guedes mail/xmpp: gue...@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
