Hi,
When analyzing the plan of a query I often find myself questioning
whether an additional index may be sensible, or if it is sensible that a
SeqScan is used if an index is available.
The current EXPLAIN ANALYZE only shows the number of tuples matching the
qualifier of an SeqScan Node - for analyzing the above situation it is
at least equally interesting how many tuples were read and discarded.
Therefore I produced a patch which adds a 'discarded=%f' part to the
analyze output.
As this is only a RFD the implementation is a bit hackish at the moment
- the discarded counter is increased in execScan directly instead of a
helper routine in instrument.c.
Also the discarded count is displayed in other node types as well - for
some there might be a sensible semantic meaning to it...
Good idea - Bad idea?
Greetings,
Andres
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
