Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>> select * from pg_class where relname='test_type'
> It's not so much that enum types are handled specially, but that
> composite types are. :-)
Relations (tables) have always had both pg_class and pg_type entries.
The pg_class entry denotes the relation proper, the pg_type entry
denotes the relation's rowtype.
Composite types have the same two entries, there's just a different
notion of which one is primary.
(The reason a composite type has to have a pg_class entry is that
it has pg_attribute entries, and those have to have something in
pg_class for their attrelid to link to.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
