On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:39 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > I agree we could've should've handled this more promptly, and I'll take > my part of the blame for that. I let the various proposed patches sit > for long times before reviewing them thoroughly, partly because I was > busy and partly because I didn't feel good about the proposed > approaches. I think what went in in the end is pretty simple and robust, > but it's a shame we had to rush to get it into beta2, after sitting on > our thumbs for months.
Through everything I just said, I have no criticism of you Heikki. I had the same emotions about the proposals. I was only explaining why I felt unable to speed up the process myself. Final patch took me an hour to code and test, so I wasn't put out or rushed. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
