On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:34 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > For the record, it became clear that I did a bad job of communicating > on this thread...
You did good work, IMHO. Not everything will reach consensus and that's not your fault. > first implement table level predicate > locks, since that has to exist and would provide a complete, if > somewhat clumsy, serializable solution; then move on to more > fine-grained locks. It would probably be workable, and possibly > optimal, to have just table and page locks; although it seems likely > that index range locks and row locks would also be worth it, > eventually. Do we need table-level predicate locks at all? What would they give us? Why not just go straight for fine-grained page-level locks? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
